Things that strengthen an IR paper:
recommendations from the Program Chairs
- The paper’s motivation and the potential impact of the addressed problem are discussed.
- The paper’s original contributions (i.e. the delta over prior art) are clearly stated.
- The paper’s claims are properly scoped and supported.
- The paper clearly describes what was done and what was not.
- The choices made in each step of the research are justified (the why’s).
- The results are presented effectively in appropriate format.
- Good discussion accompanies the results.
Experimentation (if applicable)
- The experimental design and its scale are appropriate.
- In comparative studies, appropriate baselines are used.
- The experimental results are reliable and generalizable.
- The evaluation methods employed are in line with the research questions.
- Statistical analysis is performed and reported appropriately.
- Sufficient details (with data and code where appropriate) are provided to help other researchers assess and reproduce the experiments.